More Stupid Regulations — and people are up in arms about it

Posted by Ann Sattley on Monday, July 30th, 2012

A lot of what I write about here doesn’t turn many heads — just me and my followers. Yeah, the articles tend to make a splash in certain circles, but even the people who live in the communities where the events I document take place don’t tend to have much reaction. This story is different. The comments section is full of comments that have been flagged for review/removal and name calling, etc.  People are mad about this. Of course, much of the commenting is political right vs. left jabs that don’t interest me much. But, it does interest me that this topic is gaining some attention.

So, what is it? Well, evidently, a farmer in Virginia has been cited for “selling farm products and hosting a birthday party for her best friend’s 10-year-old daughter on her 70-acre Paris, Va., farm without a special administrative permit.”

The Virginia Right to Farm Act prohibits local authorities from treating agricultural activity as a “nuisance” — which seems to be what’s happening here, since Johnson was reportedly responding to complaints from nearby residents. Boneta already had a business license the county issued her in June 2011 that allowed her to operate a “retail farm shop” on her property. Her license application specifically noted her intention to sell handspun yarns, birdhouses, soaps and other handicrafts in addition to fresh vegetables, eggs, herbs and honey.

The following month, the Fauquier County Board of Supervisors changed the classification of “farm sales” to require a special administrative permit for activities that were in compliance with the ordinance just one month before

Remember, it should not only be farmers who are upset about this. Whatever activity you enjoy doing or keeps food on your table could soon become illegal if you’re not careful to protect all liberties. If you find yourself as a complaining neighbor, ask yourself what good you are really doing for your community by getting the “authorities” involved in something like this. You are setting yourself up to be called on yourself when you think you’re doing something innocent like hosting a birthday party.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

5 comments
Same Rules for All
Same Rules for All

I wonder if the BZA members and other Fauquier county officials living in Fauquier will be fined for NOT getting a special event permit for the b-day party for their son, daughter, wife, husband, friend?  What a joke! This Zoning Administrator needs to move along.

Same Rules for All
Same Rules for All

I wonder if the BZA members and other Fauquier county officials living in Fauquier will be fined for NOT getting a special event permit for the b-day party for their son, daughter, wife, husband, friend?  What a joke!

Julie in Fauquier
Julie in Fauquier

I have read article after article about this...and to be honest, I find myself in the middle of the mess. First, I want to say that I love Fauquier County because of the farms. Second, I know the Board of Supervisors and not one is a villain. We have had villains before, actually just idiotic good ol boys who let county government run amuck...there were back door deals and years of back slapping and yucking it up, county employees and administrators who moved tax payer dollars around like monopoly money...the list goes on. But, all this began to change when Holder Trumbo, Peter Schwartz, and Chris Granger were elected. I know Holder and Peter personally. Holder is a kind generous man. He comes from a good family, owns our grocery store. Peter does have a social conscience contrary to popular belief. He is actually a pretty good guy. He has a great family and he is sick to death of taxpayer money being flushed on outrageous administrators salaries and wasted on the pet projects of administrators inflated with power. This is the problem: really rich people live in Fauquier County and some are inflated with power. Around here, the person with the most land wins. They fancy themselves to be the Dukes and Dutchesses of Fauquier. On one hand, I am grateful that their money has kept the land in wide open spaces and on the other hand they are pains in the butt. They have a history of having the politicians in their pockets. They want a county free of development, tourists, shopping malls, and Walmarts. So do I. But, they also want to control the activities of their neighbors and will sink to some pretty getto behavior to do so. The behavior includes threatening county officials to write false reports, attempting to purchase mortgages of people they do not find desirable, making horrid claims about an individual's character. Basically, screaming like little babies when they don't get their way. Sadly, our supervisors fall into their trap because land is expensive in Fauquier. We depend on people with a lot of money to purchase large parcels to keep those bucolic views everyone keeps talking about. But, the people who buy them want the vistas without the actual farming ( other than expensive horses). I wish my supervisors would read this, but they probably won't. When you are elected into public office you represent all the people, not just the ones who have a lot of money. They are not being good public servants, in the case, to Martha Boneta. Martha is a good person. She has a nice farm. She rescues animals. Lies were spread about her and rather than paying a visit to Paris Farms to see how well cared for the animals are and look at her wonderful produce, they decided to believe lies told by three people. Two who own the house and property across the street and one who is just plain certifiable.

ttillegal
ttillegal moderator

 @Julie in Fauquier So sorry that you have to deal with this, even in a background way. I feel mostly bad for Boneta, though. Ugh.

Julie in Fauquier
Julie in Fauquier

@ttillegal The county BoS had a responsibility to include Martha in the process, help, if not guide her and they decided that that would believe complete and total fabrication. I did not not want to believe that the people I trusted to represent everyone's best interest would support people who used mod boss tactics and intimidation to get what they wanted, but the FOIA requests don't lie. Now, I know who really runs Fauquier. It is confirmed and the public trust is breeched. I will support Martha's work with rescued animals, buy her wonderful produce, and encourage others to do the same. There are no abused animals on her property. They are better off for being with her. The County animal control officer's investigation supports her work. This is a matter of public record. So, is the email transmission from the disgruntled neighbor who tried to influence the animal control officer's report. She threatened to have him fired, but he didn't back down. I think this is the stuff that needs to hit every major newspaper in the country...and anyone who works in a government capacity that aided in this type of manipulation needs to be fired and exposed. Good luck to the Boneta's. I am glad they came to Fauquier County. Maybe now we will get equitable representation.